Phytochemical and In vitro Anti-inflammatory Activity on Abrus precatorius

 

K. Teja1*, Dr. T. Satyanarayana2, B. Saraswathi2, B. Goutham2, K. Mamatha2, P. Samyuktha2, S. Tharangini2

1Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutics, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, Sathupally, Khammam, Dist, 507303, India.

2Department of Pharmaceutics, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, Sathupally, Khammam Dist, 507303, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: sarru.saraswati@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Plants have been one of the important sources of medicines even since the damn of human civilization. Inspite of tremendous development in the field of allopathy during the 20 th century, plants still remain one of the major sources of during in the modern as well as traditional system of medicine throughout the world. Abrus Precatorius L. (Family-Fabaceae). it is well known official drug thought the country as a holistic gift of nature for medicinal, culinary and cosmetic use. It has been found to possess various therapeutic activities, viz. analgesic ant allergic, antifungal, ant diabetic, antibacterial, antiulcer, immunostimulating, anti- cancer, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and many more. For different concentrations (100, 200, 400, 800µg/ml) of each extract (hydroalcohol) were studied in activity which involved the determination of Anti-inflammatory activity, Diclofenac sodium in the same concentration as the extract was included as standard reference. The extract exhibited significant Anti-inflammatory activity at a concentration of 800µg/ml in this case it was found that hydro alcohol extract gives better activity compared to the standard. Results showed that Abrus Precatorius seed extract gives better Anti-inflammatory activity at all the tested doses.

 

KEYWORDS: Abrus Precatorius, Anti-inflammatory activity, Diclofenac sodium.

 

 


 

 

INTRODUCTION:

The word inflammation comes from the Latin word inflammare, means to burn. Inflammation is a response of the tissues to an injection, irritation (or) foreign substances. It is a part of host’s defence (or) inflammation, a defensive reaction to injury with classical signs of warmth, reddening, pain, swelling and loss of function, is of acute or chronic type Inflammation is normal and necessary protective response to the harmful stimuli such as infectious agents, antigen-antibody reactions, thermal, chemical, physical agents, and Ischemia. It is caused by a variety of stimuli, including physical damage, UV irradiation, microbial attack, and immune reactions. The classical key features of inflammation are redness, warmth, swelling, and pain. Inflammation cascades can lead to the development of diseases such as chronic asthma, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis. Many of these diseases are debilitating and are becoming increasingly common in our ageing society1-5.

 

Medicinal plants can be important source of previously unknown chemical substances with potenttherapeutic effects. Herbal medicines are in great demand in the developed as well as developing countries for primary health care because of their wide biological and medicinal activities, higher safety margins and lesser costs. Natural products in general and medicinal plants in particular are believed to be an important source of new chemical substances with potential therapeutic effects6-8. Plant extracts as well as their primary and secondary metabolites have important therapeutic role in the treatment of many human diseases. Medicinal plants have a traditional medicine or folk medicine practise based on the use of plants and plant extracts. Many herbs synthesize substances that are useful for the maintenance of human health. Phytochemicals not only have protective or disease preventive properties but also protect humans from a host of diseases. Major constituents of more than 50% of all the drugs in clinical use are natural products and their derivatives. There has been an growing interest in the study of medicinal plants as natural products in diverse part of the world. Medicinal plants containing active chemical constituents with higher antioxidant property play an important role in the prevention of various degenerative diseases9-10.

 

Plants have been always used as medicine by mankind to treat health-threatening diseases and still popular to obtain new drug candidates as it is the oldest medical practice for humans11-15. The use of botanical natural health products are on the increase all over the world. It is known that almost 80% of the populations in developing countries rely on the traditional medicine, mainly composing herbal prescriptions. Abrus precatorius is a woody twinning plant with characteristic red seeds with black mark at the base. It is native to India. It is a beautiful, much branched, slender, perennial, deciduous, woody, twinning or climbing herb16-19.

 

Traditional uses of Abrus Precatorius:

Leaves:

The leaves of the herb are used to cure fever, cough and cold, the paste of leaves and seeds are applied for the greying of hair20-22.

 

Roots:

Paste of roots is used to cure abdominal pains, tumours and also for abortion, root is chewed as a snake bite remedy, the roots are used to treat jaundice and haemoglobinuric bile, Hot water extract of fresh root is an anti-malarial and anti-convulsant, Decoction of dried root is used to treat bronchitis and hepatitis.

 

Seeds:

Dry seeds of A. precatorius are used to cure worm infection, in veterinary medicine, it is used in the treatment of fractures, Seeds have also the potential of good insecticide and antimicrobial activity23-25.

 

Biological and Pharmacological Action:

During past several years Abrus Precatorius is gaining lot of interest according to researchers’ point of view. Recently many pharmacological studies have been conducted on Abrus Precatorius26-28. A summary of the findings of these studies performed is presented below: Anti-microbial activity, Hepatoprotective, Immunomodulator, Anti- Diabetic, Anti-Oxidant, Anti-Ulcer, Anti-alleric, Anti-tumor, Anti-bacterial, Anti-fungal, Gastro protective activity, Anti-inflammatory29-31

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Collection of sample:

Fresh Abrus precatorius seeds were collected from Kistapuram, khammam district, Telangana during June 2018. They were washed with distilled water twice. Then they were dried and powdered.

 

Drugs and chemicals:

Folinciocalteus phenol reagent, bromocresol green solution, egg albumin, diclofenac, HRBC solution are the samples obtained from Sree Srinivasa Scientifics.

 

PREPARATION OF EXTRACTS:

250g of dried seed powder were suspended in 1liter of hydro alcohol (methanol: water 70:30). Extraction was done at 800C by using soxhlate apparatus for 3 hour 30 minutes. Followed by filtering of the extracts using what man filter paper no 1. Extract was then concentrated at 800C for 3hours to form a semisolid form and they were transferred into sterile wide mouthed bottles and refrigerated until used.  

 

Physicochemical parameters:

Phytochemical analysis was carried out for saponins, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, terpenoids, steroids, tannins, phenol, anthraquinone. Alkaloids, and tannins was performed as described by authors. wagners and hagers reagents were used for alkaloid foam test for saponins. Killer-killani test for cardiac glycosides, salkowski test for terpenoids, sulphuric acid for steroids, chloride and gelatin for tannins, ferric chloride for phenol, hexane and diluted ammonia for anthraquinone test, all these experiments were carried out for hydro alcoholic seed extract of abrus precatorius.

 

 

Evaluation of Anti- inflammatory activity:

Membrane stabilization method:

Preparation of red blood cells (RBCs) suspension: The blood was collected from healthy human volunteer who has not taken any NSAIDs (Non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) for two weeks prior to the experiment and transferred to the centrifuge tubes. The tubes were centrifuged at 3000rpm for 10minutes and were washed 3 times with equal volume of normal saline. The volume of blood was measured and re constituted as 10% v/v suspension with normal saline.

 

Hypotonicity induced haemolysis:

Different concentrations of extract (100-800µg/ml), reference sample and control were separately mixed with 1ml of phosphate buffer, 2ml of hyposaline and 0.5ml of HRBC suspension. Diclofenac sodium was used as a standard drug. All the assay mixtures were incubated at 37şC for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 3000rpm. The supernatant liquid was decanted and haemoglobin content was estimated by a spectrophotometer at 560nm. The experiment was performed at triplicate. The percentage haemolysis was estimated by assuming the haemolysis produced in the control as 100%.

 

% Protection = 100- (OD of sample/OD of control) ×100

 

Inhibition of albumin denaturation method:

The anti-inflammatory activity of Abrus precatorius was studied by using the method of inhibition of albumin denaturation technique. The reaction mixture was consists of 1ml of tests extracts (100µg- 800µg) and 1ml of 1% aqueous solution of bovine albumin fraction. The samples were incubated at 37±1°C for 15 min and then denaturation was induced by boiling at 60°C for 10 min, after cooling the samples the turbidity was measured at 640nm. The experimentwas performed at triplicate. The percentage inhibition of albumin denaturation was studied by using following formula:

Percentage inhibition = (Absorbance of Control-Absorbance of Sample) × 100/Absorbance of control.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Physicochemical screening:

S. No

Physicochemical parameters

Seed powder

1

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

2

3

4

a

b

c

5

Extractive values:

Hexane

Chloroform

Ethyl acetate

Acetone

Methanol

Water

Methanol: Water

Swelling Index

Foaming Index

Ash values

Total ash

Water soluble ash

Acid insoluble ash

Loss on drying

 

1.59%

2.4%

4.55%

2.94%

9.02%

15.69%

12.5%

      -   

<100

 

3.04%

58%

2.14%

8.4%

Phytochemical Screening:

Table No: 2: Preliminary phytochemical analysis of hydro-alcoholic seed extracts of Abrus precatorius.

Tests

Hydro-alcoholic seed extract

Alkaloids

              ++

Triterpenoids

              ++

Tannins

              +

Phenols

              +

Flavonoids

              +

Saponins

              ++

Carbohydrates

              -

Proteins

              +

Glycosides

              +

Coumarins

              +

 (+++ = more intense, ++= intense, += present, - = absent)

 

Preliminary phytochemical screening of the hydro alcoholic seed extract of A. Precatorius reveals the presence of Alkaloids, Tannins, Glycosides, Saponins, Flavonoids and Terpenoids. Different doses of the extracts were screened for their activity mainly due to the presence of flavonoids respectively as shown in table 1 and 2.

 

QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION:

Table: 3 Results for the quantitative estimation of the hydro-alcoholic seed extract of Abrus precatorius.

Test type

Seed

Total Flavonoid content

10.76±0.00(mg QE/g)

Total Alkaloid   content

51.56±0.028(mg A/g)

Total Phenolic content

34.91±0.030(mg GA/g)

 

 

Table: 4 percentage membrane stabilization activity of the hydro-alcoholic seed extract of Abrus precatorius.

Concentration

(µg/ml)

% Membrane stabilization

Hydro Alcoholic Seed Extract

Diclofenac sodium

100

10.71

8.2

200

41.07

33.2

400

50

38.4

800

64.2

50.3

 

 

 

 

Figure no 1: Anti inflammatory activity of Abrus precatorius seed Extract by using Membrane stabilization method

 

The HRBC membrane stabilization has been used as a method to study the invitro anti- inflammatory activity because the erythrocyte membrane is analogous to the lysosomal membrane and its stabilization implies that the extract may well stabilize lysosomal membranes. Stabilization of lysosomal membrane is important in limiting the inflammatory response by preventing the release of lysosomal constituents of activated neutrophil, such as bacterial enzymes and proteases, which causes further tissue inflammation and damage upon extra cellular release. The lysosomal enzymes released during inflammation produce a various disorders. The extra cellular activity of these enzymes are said to be related to acute or chronic inflammation. The non-steroidal drugs act either by inhibiting these lysosomal enzymes or by stabilizing the lysosomal membrane.

 

The hydro-alcoholic root, seed and leaf extracts of Abrus precatorius showed dose dependant membrane stabilization activity. The hydro-alcoholic root extract of Abrus precatorius has showed better membrane stabilization activity i.e., 64.2% at the concentration 800µg/ml as compared to the membrane stabilization activity of standard drug (Diclofenac sodium) i.e., 8.2% at the concentration of 100µg/ml as shown in figure no 1 and table no 4.

 

Anti inflammatory activity of Abrus precatorius seed Extract by Percentage inhibition of albumin denaturation method

 

Table 5: Percentage inhibition of albumin denaturation of the hydro- alcoholic seed extract of Abrus precatorius.

Concentration

(µg/ml)

% inhibition of albumin denaturation method

Hydro Alcoholic Seed Extract

Diclofenac sodium

100

9.09

8

200

18.1

13.8

400

36.3

24.3

800

45.4

30.3

 

 

 

Figure 2: Anti inflammatory activity of Abrus precatorius seed Extract by inhibition of albumin denaturation method

 

Protein denaturation is a process in which proteins lose their tertiary structure and secondary structure by application of external stress or compound, such as strong acid or base, a concentrated inorganic salt, an organic solvent or heat. Most biological proteins lose their biological function when denatured. Denaturation of proteins is a well-documented cause of inflammation. As part of the investigation on the mechanism of the anti-inflammation activity, ability of plant extract to inhibit protein denaturation was studied. It was effective in inhibiting heat induced albumin denaturation.

 

The hydro-alcoholic root, seed extract and leaf extracts of Abrus precatorius showed dose dependant inhibition of albumin denaturation activity. The hydro-alcoholic root extract of Abrus precatorius has showed better inhibition of albumin denaturation activity i.e., 45.4% at the concentration 800µg/ml as compared to the inhibition of albumin denaturation activity of standard drug (Diclofenac sodium) i.e., 8% at the concentration of 100µg/ml.

 

Hydro alcoholic extract has significant Anti-inflammatory activity when compared to standard Diclofenac sodium. Membrane stabilization and percentage inhibition of albumin denaturation methods of hydro alcoholic extract was 10.71,41.07,50,64.2 and 9.09,18.1,36.3,45.4 respectively at concentrations 100, 200, 400, 800 µg/ml for the seed extract. and these are 8.2,33.2,38.4,50.3 and 8,13.8,24.3,30.3 respectively at concentrations 100, 200, 400, 800 µg/ml for Diclofenac sodium as shown in table no 5 and figure no 2.

 

CONCLUSION:

The work states that the presence of Flavonoids, Terpenoids and in the extract of Abrus Precatorius Linn was responsible for its Anti-inflammatory activity. Hydro alcoholic extract was shown significant Invitro activities like Membrane stabilization and percentage of inhibition of albumin denaturation methods. It is interesting to observe the results of Anti-inflammatory effect of hydro alcohol extract. But further investigations on the isolation of active compounds present in the extracts and in vivo studies are necessary to identify a potential chemical entity for clinical use. Hydro-alcoholic root extract of Abrus precatorius showed maximum membrane stabilization and inhibition of albumin denaturation activity in comparison to hydro alcoholic seed and leaf extract of Abrus precatorius. The results of the membrane stabilization activity and the inhibition of albumin denaturation activity indicates that the hydro-alcoholic root, seed and leaf extract of Abrus precatorius shows more membrane stabilization when compared to inhibition of albumin denaturation.

 

REFERENCE:

1.     Chirangini P, Amit Kumar B N, Pandey GJ, Rama SH and Mishra KP (2006). “Herbals for Human health and Disease: Prospects and challenges in 21st century”. In Herbal Drugs- A twenty first century perspective, Jaypee Brothers, 2.

2.     Tyler VE (2003). “Phytomedicines: Past, Present and Future-from an American Point of View”, In: Sprecher E and Caesar W. (Eds.) Society for medicinal plant research, 50 years 1953-2003 A jubilee edition, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsge sellschaft Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany. 89

3.     Bandyopadhyay U, Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I and Banerjee RK (2002). “Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica)”, Curr Sci, 82(11),1336-1345.

4.     Mazumdar KP (2001). “Pharmaceutical Science in Homeopathy and Pharmacodynamics”, B. Jain Publishers Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.

5.     Martin-Herrera D, Abdala S, Benjumea D and Gutierrez-Luis J (2008). “Diuretic activity of some Withania aristata Ait.fraction”, J Ethnopharmacol, 117, 496-499.

6.     Chaudhary G, Goyal S and Poonia P (2010). “Lawsonia inermis Linnaeus: A Phytopharmacological Review”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Drug and Research, 2(2), 91-98.

7.     Gill NS, Bajwa J, Dhiman K, Sharma P and Sood Set al., (2011a). “Evaluation of therauptic potential of traditionally consumed Cucumis melo seeds”. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 86-91.

8.     Gill NS, Bajwa J, Dhiman K, Sharma P and Sood Set al., (2011b). “Evaluation of Antioxidant and antiulcer activity of traditionally consumed Cucumis melo seeds”. J. Pharmacol.Toxicol, 6, 82-89.

9.     Tapsell LC, Hemphill I, Cobiac L, Patch CS and Sullivan DR (2006). “Health benefits of herbs and spices: The past, the present, the future”. Med. J. Aust, 185, S4-S24.

10.   Suleiman MN (2011). Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2(4): 108-111.

11.   Satwinderjeetkaur and Subodh kumar (2010). American Journal of Biomedical Sciences, 2(2): 164-177.

12.   Rajeswari G, Murugan M and Mohan VR (2012). Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, biological and chemical Sciences, 3(4): 301-308.

13.   Rajiv Nema (2012). International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research, 1(5): 283-286.

14.   Mukherjee P (2002). “Alternative systems of medicine, In: Quality Control of Herbal Drugs”: 30.

15.   Simone Badal and Rupika Delgoda. “Pharmacognosy fundamentals, applications and strategies”: 8.

16.   Mahady GB (2001). “Global harmonization of herbal health claims”. J Nutr, 131: 1120S–1123S.

17.   Yukimune Y, Tabata H, Higashi Y and Hara Y (1996). “Methyl jasmonate-induced overproduction of paclitaxel and baccatin III in Taxus cell suspension cultures”. Nat Biotechnol, 14: 1129–32.

18.   Hitoshi Saito, Hiroshi Yoshikawa, Yoshio Nishimura and Kondo S (1986).  “Studies on lignane lactone antitumor agents”, Chemical Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 34(9): 3733-3740.

19.   Frohne D and Pfander HJ (1983). “A Colour Atlas of Poisonous Plants”, Wolfe Publishing Ltd. Germany: 291. 

20.   Narendra Garaniya and Atul Bapodra (2014). “Ethanobotanical and phytopharmacological potential of Abrus precatorius L:  A Review”, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 4: 27 -34.

21.   Samuel Ehiabhi Okhale and Ezekwesiri Micheal Nwanosike (2016). “Abrus precatorius Linn (Fabaceae): Phytochemistry, ethanomedical uses, ethanopharmacology and pharmacological activities”, International Journal of Pharmaceutical sciences and research, 6(6): 37-43.

22.   Dr. Kishor S. Chandhari (2012). “Pharmacological activities of Abrus precatorius Linn- A Review”, International Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal medicine, 2(2): 336-348.

23.   Kokate CK, Purohit AR and Gokhale SB (1994). Text book of pharmacognosy, 49, Nirali Prakashan: A.22-A.27.

24.   Indian Pharmacopoeia (1996). Ministry of Health and Family welfare, Govt of India, New Delhi, Controller of Publications, 2: A - 53 – 54, A-95, A-97, A-109.

25.   Singleton VL and Rossi JA (1965). “Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic -phosphotungstic acid reagents”. Am J Enol Vitic, 16: 144-158.

26.   Singleton VL, Orthofer R and Lamuela-Raventós RM (1999). “Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent”, Method Enzymol, 299: 152-178.

27.   Quettier DC, Gressier B, Vasseur J, Dine T, Brunet C, Luyckx M.C, Cayin JC, Bailleul F, Trotin F (2000). “Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour”, J. Ethnopharmacol, 72: 35-42.

28.   Fazal H, Ahamad N and Khan MA (2011). “Physicochemical, phytochemical evaluation and DPPH-scavenging antioxidant potential in medicinal plants used for herbal formulation in Pakistan”. Pak. J. Bot,43: 63-67.

29.   Sir George watt (1889). “Directory of Economic Products of India”.

30.    Goldyne ME, Burrish GF, Poubelle P and Borgeat P (1984). “Arachidonic acid metabolism among human mononuclear leukocytes, Lipoxygenase related pathways”. J Biol Chem, 259: 8815-8819.

31.   Anonymus (1975). “Physiology of Inflammation”, Feature trends in Inflammation, 2(5):1-3.

 

 

 

Received on 28.11.2018                Modified on 31.12.2018

Accepted on 20.01.2019            © A&V Publications All right reserved

Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2019; 9(1):50-54.

DOI: 10.5958/2231-5659.2019.00008.0