Development and
Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Aceclofenac
and Tramadol in
Tablet Dosage Form
Kumaraswamy. Gandla*, T. Harika. R. Lalitha
Department of
Pharmaceutical Analysis,
Teegala Ram Reddy College of
Pharmacy,
Meerpet, Hyderabad- 505172, Telangana.
*Corresponding Author E-mail:
kumaraswamy.gandla@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The
present work deals with the development of a precise, accurate, simple,
specific, reliable and less time consuming RP-HPLC method for the estimation of
Aceclofenac and Tramadol tablets .The chromatographic
separation was achieved on a Inertsil C18 ODS(4.6 x 250mm, 5µm)
with a mobile phase combination of methanol and water (50:50) v/v at a
flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, and the
detection was carried out by using PDA
detector at 290 nm. Ambient column temperature has maintained. The total run
time was 10mins.The retention time of Tramadol and
Aceclofenac were found to be 2.9 min. and 3.5 min. respectively. The
performance of the method was validated according to the present ICH
guidelines.
KEYWORDS: RP-HPLC,
Aceclofenac, Tramadol, PDA detection Tablet dosage
forms.
INTRODUCTION:
Tramadol is a antibiotic belonging to the chemical class of pencillins derivatives Chemically it is
(2S,5R,6R)-6-[3-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-5-methyl-1,2-oxazole-4-amido]-3,3-
dimethyl-7-oxo-4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid.1-3
Tramadol exerts a bactericidal action against
penicillin-susceptible microorganisms during the state of active
multiplication. All penicillins inhibit the
biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall. By binding to specific
penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) located inside the bacterial cell wall, Tramadol inhibits the third and last stage of bacterial
cell wall synthesis. Cell lysis is then mediated by
bacterial cell wall autolytic enzymes such as
autolysins; it is possible that Tramadol interferes
with an autolysin inhibitor. Tramadol and Aceclofenac
are formulated together in the form of a tablet.
Literature survey revealed
no method reported for simultaneous determination of the two drugs. The present
RP-HPLC method uses simple mobile phase ratio, higher sensitivity and analysis
will complete before 7 min. Therefore the present study was to determine both drugs
concurrently by sensitive, accurate, rapid and precise RP-HPLC4-9
method for routine analysis.
Fig.No.1.chemical structure of Tramadol.
Aceclofenac is a anti- bacterial agent.
: (6R,7R)-7-[(2Z)-2-(2-amino-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)-2-(methoxyimino) acetamido]-3-(methoxymethyl)-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic
acid1-3. The molecular formula is C15H17N5O6S2;the
molecular weight is 427.455; the structural formula is.
Fig.No.2.Chemical
structure of Aceclofenac
MATERIALS
AND METHODS:
Reagents and chemicals
Methanol HPLC grade was
procured from E. Merck Ltd, Mumbai. Methanol, Acetonitrile. Fine chemicals, Hyderabad. Water HPLC
grade was prepared using Millipore purification system. Tramadol
and Aceclofenac reference standards procured from Active Pharma
labs, Hyderabad.
Instrumentation
The HPLC system consists of
water Empower -2690/5 having photodiode array detector system, which was
connected with the help of Empower 3000 software for data integration and
processing. Inertsil ODS‐3V (250 X 4.6 mm) 5μ column was used for the
analysis.
HPLC conditions
The contents of the mobile
phase were Methanol and Water in the ratio of 50:50 v/v. These were filtered
through 0.45μ membrane filter and degassed by sonication before use. The
flow rate of mobile phase was optimized to 1.0 ml / min. The run time was set
at 7 min and column temperature was maintained at ambient. The volume of
injection was 20 μl, and the eluent
was detected at 290 nm. Each of standard and test preparations was injected
into the column and the responses recorded (Fig.05 and Fig.06.).
METHOD
The RP-HPLC Method of
Aceclofenac and Tramadol were achieved by isocratic
elution technique with PDA Detector. Aceclofenac and Tramadol
were determined at 290nm respectively
with the concentration range of 0.20-0.8g/ml for both Aceclofenac and Tramadol respectively.fig.03 and04. For analysis of tablet formulation the tablet powder
equivalent to 25 mg was taken, dissolved in 25 ml volumetric flask and made up
to 25ml with Methanol. The solution was sonicated for
15min, centrifuged at 100 rpm for 15 min and filtered through Whatman filter
paper No.41. From clear solution, further dilutions were made to get 10 µg/ml of Aceclofenac and Tramadol
theoretically.
Figure 3: Calibration Graph of Aceclofenac
Figure 4: Calibration Graph of Tramadol
Figure 5: Typical chromatograms for recovery studies
For recovery studies, to
the reanalyzed formulation, solutions of raw material containing different
concentrations were added and the amount of drug recovered was calculated. The
procedure was repeated as per the analysis of formulation. The amount of drug
recovered was calculated by using slope and intercept values from the
calibration graph.
Finally the method was validated as per
ICH guide lines for precision, accuracy, specificity, linearity,
reproducibility, limit of detection and limit of quantification.
Figure 6: Typical chromatogram of Tramadol and Aceclofenac
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION:
A simple, selective, rapid
and precise validated RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Aceclofenac and Tramadol in bulk material and in pharmaceutical formulation has
been developed and validated. The correlation coefficient was found to be
0.9997and0.9998 Aceclofenac for and Tramadol respectively.fig.03 and fig.04. In this method the % purity were found to be
98.0 – 101.50 respectively. The recovery studies range is.99.98-100.03% and
99.94 – 100.01 % for Tramadol
and Aceclofenac, respectively. Detection limit was found to be 0.17for Tramadol and 0.36 for Aceclofenac. The Intraday and Inter
day analysis carried out for precision. The ruggedness study was
performed.
In First order Derivative
method the % purity were found to be 98.0 – 101.50 respectively, respectively.
The recovery studies range is 99.98-100.03% and 99.94 – 100.01 %. Table 1.The
Intraday and Inter day analysis carried out for precision. The ruggedness study
was performed. The method was validated for statistical analysis
Table 1: Recovery Studies
(a)Data of Accuracy
(Recovery) for Tramadol
|
Concentration % of spiked level |
Amount added (ppm) |
Amount found (ppm) |
% Recovery |
Statistical Analysis of % Recovery |
|
|
50% Injection 1 |
20 |
19.98 |
99.93 |
MEAN |
100.01 |
|
50% Injection 2 |
20 |
20.02 |
100.10 |
|
|
|
50% Injection 3 |
20 |
20.0 |
100.00 |
%RSD |
0.09 |
|
100 % Injection 1 |
40 |
39.99 |
99.98 |
MEAN |
100.10 |
|
100 % Injection 2 |
40 |
40.10 |
100.26 |
|
|
|
100% Injection 3 |
40 |
40.03 |
100.08 |
%RSD |
0.14 |
|
150% Injection 1 |
60 |
60.02 |
100.03 |
MEAN |
100.00 |
|
150% Injection 2 |
60 |
60.01 |
100.01 |
|
|
|
150% Injection 3 |
60 |
59.99 |
99.98 |
%RSD |
0.03 |
(b)Data of Accuracy (Recovery) for Aceclofenac
|
Concentration % of spiked level |
Amount added (ppm) |
Amount found (ppm) |
% Recovery |
Statistical Analysis of % Recovery |
|
|
50 % Injection
1 |
20 |
19.99 |
99.94 |
MEAN |
99.94 |
|
50 % Injection 2 |
20 |
19.98 |
99.95 |
|
|
|
50 % Injection 3 |
20 |
19.98 |
99.95 |
%RSD |
0.01 |
|
100 % Injection 1 |
40 |
39.99 |
99.98 |
MEAN |
100.04 |
|
100 % Injection 2 |
40 |
40.00 |
100.01 |
|
|
|
100 % Injection 3 |
40 |
40.05 |
100.13 |
%RSD |
0.08 |
|
150 % Injection 1 |
60 |
59.99 |
99.98 |
MEAN |
99.97 |
|
150% Injection 2 |
60 |
59.98 |
99.97 |
|
|
|
150% Injection 3 |
60 |
59.99 |
99.98 |
%RSD |
0.01 |
CONCLUSION
The developed RP-HPLC
method was validated and the statistical validation was performed with the
simplicity and ease of operation ensures that the validated method can
successfully used for routine Analysis of Aceclofenac and Tramadol
in bulk and tablet dosage formulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors are thankful to
principal and Chairman of Teegala Ram Reddy College of
Pharmacy Meerpet-Hyderabad and Also thank full to
Chandra Labs for their kind help and providing all necessary facilities.
REFERENCE:
1. Laurenc L. Brunton,
John S. Lazo, Keith L. Parker; ‘Goodman and Gilman’s
the Pharmacological
Basis of Therapeutics; Mc Graw Hill, New York, U.S.A;
2006; 11:P.1136-1142.
2. O’Neil
MJ. The Merk Index- An
Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and
Biological, New Jersy, Merck and Co., Inc; 13:
p.159, 917.
3. United
States Pharmacopoeia NF; 23; 2004; 23: p.198, 377.
4. Indian
Pharmacopoeia 2010 (2): p.149, 857, 151, 1018.
5. British
Pharmacopoeia 2005 (3): p.192.
6. B.
Barrett, V. Borek-Dohalsky, P. Fejt,
S. Vaingatova, J. Huclova.
B. Nemec, I. Jelinek. Validated HPLC-MS-MS method for the determination of Azithromycin in human plasma. Anal Bioanal Chem. September 005;383(2):210-7.
7. M.
Senthil Raja, Shan. S.H,P. Perumal, M.T.S. Moorthy.
Validation for the
simultaneous estimation of Azithromycin
and Ambroxil Hydrochloride in tablets. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. Jan-Mar 2010;2(1):36-9.
8. Narendra Nyola, Govindasamy Jeyabalan. Simultaneous estimation of Cefixime and Azithromycin in API’S and pharmaceutical dosage form by
RP-HPLC. Indo American J Pharm Res.2013;2(12):1472-81.
Received on 25.06.2015 Accepted
on 30.07.2015
© Asian Pharma Press All
Right Reserved
Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci.
5(3): July-Sept.; Page 135-138
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5659.2015.00021.1