Simultaneous determination of Pravastatin and Valsartan in
Synthetic Mixture using Spectrophotometric technique
(Simultaneous Equation Method)
Grishma
S Trivedi, Meera V Lad, Hasumati A Raj
Shree Dhanvantary College of Pharmacy, Kim, Surat,
Gujarat, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: divyapatel388@gmail.com, drharaj@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple, accurate and precise spectroscopic method was developed
for simultaneous estimation of Edaravone and Argatroban in synthetic mixture using first order
derivative zero-crossing method. Edaravone showed
zero crossing point at 351.00 nm while Argatroban
showed zero crossing point at 280.47 nm. The dA/dλ was measured at 280.47 nm for Edaravone
and 351.00nm for Argatroban and calibration curves
were plotted as dA/dλ
versus concentration, respectively. The method was found to be linear
(r2>0.998) in the range of 10-35μg/ml for Edaravone
at 280.47 nm. The linear correlation was obtained (r2>0.999) in the range of
10-35 μg/ml for Argatroban
at 351.0 nm. The limit of determination was 1.59μg/ml and 1.87μg/ml
for Edaravone and Argatroban,
respectively. The limit of quantification was 4.83 μg/ml and 5.68 μg/ml
for Edaravone and Argatroban,
respectively. The accuracy of these method were evaluated by recovery studies
and good recovery result were obtained greater than 99% shows first order
derivation zero crossing. The method was successfully applied for simultaneous
determination of Edaravone and Argatroban
in binary mixture.
KEYWORDS:
INTRODUCTION:
Stroke is characterized by the
sudden loss of blood circulation to an area of the brain, resulting in a
corresponding loss of neurologic function. Strokes are classified as either
hemorrhagic or ischemic. Acute ischemic stroke caused by thrombosis or
embolism. The term ischemic stroke is
used to describe a variety of conditions in which blood flow to part or all of
the brain is reduced, resulting in tissue damage.
Edaravone and Argatroban
combination was approved on 13 September 2002, Patented by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Japan. Patent No: EP 1437137 B1(2) Combination of both these
drugs may help to improve outcomes after cerebral ischemia. Edaravone,
a free radical scavenger, is a novel neuroprotective
agent, and Argatroban is a selective thrombin
inhibitor. Both the drugs were approved by the Japanese Government, and have
frequently been used for the treatment of acute brain infarction in Japan.(clinical trials)(3)
A. Edaravone(4-12)
Figure 1 :
Chemical Structure of Edaravone
Edaravone is a neuroprotective
agent used for the purpose of aiding neurological recovery following acute
brain ischemia and subsequent cerebral infarction(4).It acts as a potent antioxidant and strongly
scavenges free radicals, protecting against oxidative stress and neuronal
apoptosis.(6-7)The
preventive effect is due to suppression of reperfusion caused oxidative
endothelium cell damage since edarevone was found to
inhibit 15-HPETE (15-hydroxy peroxy icosatetraenoic acid) as well as cortical edema of rat
brain induced by arachidonate micro injection.
Edaravone has been shown to attenuate
methamphetamine- and 6-OHDA(Ortho Hydroxy
Dopamine) induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity in the
striatum and substantianigra, and does not affect
methamphetamine-induced dopamine release or hyperthermia.(8,9)It has also been demonstrated to protect against
MPTP-mediated dopaminergic neurotoxicity to the substantianigra, though notably not to the striatum.(10-12)
B. Argatroban(13,14)
Figure 2: Chemical structure of Argatroban
Due to its selective inhibitory mechanism,
argatroban blocks both
circulating and clot-bound thrombin. Argatroban
is a direct thrombin inhibitor that binds reversibly to the catalytic site of
thrombin and that does not require other cofactors to exert its antithrombotic
action. Argatroban exerts its anticoagulant effects
by inhibiting thrombin-catalyzed or induced reactions, including fibrin
formation; activation of coagulation factors V, VIII, and XIII; activation of
protein C; and platelet aggregation.
A rapid onset of its anticoagulant action is achieved
after intravenous administration. The elimination half-life of argatroban is (52+/-16 minutes) which is short enough to ensures a rapid restoration of hemostasis
upon cessation of treatment. Argatroban
produces a predictable dose response, and its anticoagulant actions can be
monitored easily through the routine coagulation tests activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and
activated clotting time (ACT).
The review of literature regarding quantitative
analysis of Edaravone and Argatroban
revealed that no attempt was made to develop analytical methods for Edaravone and Argatroban. Some
spectrometric methods and chromatographic methods have been reported for the
estimation of the individual drugs.(15-29)
MATERIAL AND
METHODS:
Apparatus and instrument:
Ψ A double beam UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu model 2450, Japan) with spectral width of 2 nm, 1 cm quartz cells was
used to measure absorbance
of all the solutions.
Ψ Spectra were
automatically obtained by UV-Probe system software.
Ψ An analytical balance (Sartorius CD2250, Gottingen, Germany) was used for
weighing the
samples.
Ψ Sonicator(D120/2H, TRANS-O-SONIC)
Ψ Class B volumetric glassware were used (Borosillicte)
Ψ All instruments
and glass wares
were calibrated.
Reagents and
material:
Ψ Edaravone (Gift sample from BDR
Pharmaceutical International Pvt. Ltd.)
Ψ Argatroban (Gift sample from BDR
Pharmaceutical International Pvt. Ltd.)
Ψ Methanol AR Grade (FINAR), Distilled Water,
NaOH AR Grade (RANCHEM), HCl
(ASTRON) was used for development purpose.
First derivative conditions:
Ψ Mode : Spectrum
Ψ Scan speed : Fast
Ψ Wavelength range : 200-400
nm
Ψ Derivative order :
first
Ψ Scaling factor:
1
Preparation of standard solutions:
Standard
solution of Edaravone (EDA):
Preparation of stock solution of EDA:
Accurately weighed quantity of EDA 10 mg was transferred to
100ml volumetric flask, dissolved, and diluted up to mark with methanol to give
a stock solution having strength 100΅g/ml.
Standard solution of Argatroban
(ARG):
Preparation of stock solution of ARG:
Accurately weighed quantity of ARG 10 mg was transferred
into 100 ml volumetric flask, dissolved and diluted up to mark with methanol to
give a stock solution having strength 100΅g/ml.
Preparation of Standard
Mixture Solution (EDA + ARG):
1ml of standard stock solution of EDA (100μg/ml) and
1ml of standard stock solution of ARG (100μg/ml) were pipetted
out into two 10ml volumetric flasks and volume was adjusted to the mark with
methanol to get 10μg/ml of EDA and 10μg/ml of ARG.
Preparation of test
solution:
The preparation of synthetic mixture was as per patent:
Ψ Edaravone : 30mg
Ψ Sodium Bisulphite
: 30mg
Ψ Argatroban:10mg
Ψ Phosphoric acid: q.s
(adjust pH4.5)
Ψ Water for Injection : 7.5 ml (finally upto 25ml)
All the excipients
were mixed in 100ml volumetric flask dissolved in 25 ml of distilled water and sonicated for 15min. make up the volume with methanol up to
100 ml. The solution was filtered through Whatman filter
paper No.
42.
Finally the solution had concentration 300μg/ml for EDA and 100μg/ml for ARG.
Validation of proposed method:
Parameters to be considered for
the validation of methods are:
1) Linearity and range
Procedure:
The linearity response was determined by analyzing 6 independent levels of calibration curve in the range of
10-35μg/ml and 10-35μg/ml for EDA
and
ARG respectively (n=6).
Calibration curves for EDA:
This series consisted of six concentrations of standard EDA solution ranging from 10-35μg/ml. The solutions were prepared by pipetting
out Standard EDA stock solution (1ml,
1.5ml, 2ml, 2.5ml, 3ml, 3.5ml)
was transferred into a series of 10 ml volumetric flask and volume
was
adjusted up to mark with Methanol.
A zero
order
derivative spectrum of the resulting solution was recorded and processed to first derivative
spectra, measured the absorbance at 280.47nm against a reagent blank
solution (Methanol). Calibration curve was prepared by
plotting absorbance versus respective concentration of EDA.
Calibration curve for ARG:
This series consisted of six concentrations of standard ARG solution ranging from 10-35μg/ml. The solutions were prepared by pipetting out Standard ARG stock solution
(1ml, 1.5ml, 2ml, 2.5ml, 3ml, 3.5ml)
was transferred into a series of 10 ml volumetric flask and volume
was
adjusted up to mark with Methanol.
A
zero
order
derivative spectrum of the resulting solution was recorded and processed to first derivative
spectra, measured the absorbance at 351.0 nm
against a reagent blank
solution (Methanol). Calibration curve was prepared by
plotting absorbance versus respective concentration of ARG.
2) Precision
I. Intraday
precision
Procedure
Ψ The precision of the developed method was assessed by analyzing samples
of
the same batch in nine determinations
with three Standard solutions
containing concentrations
10,15,20μg/ml for EDA and
10,15,20μg/ml for ARG and
three replicate (n=3)each on same day.
Ψ First-derivative absorbance (D1)
was measured at
280.47nm for EDA and
351.0nm for ARG.
Ψ The %
RSD value of the results corresponding to
the absorbance
was expressed for intra-day precision.
II. Interday Precision
Procedure
Ψ The precision of the developed method was assessed by analyzing samples
of the same batch in nine determinations
with three Standard solutions
containing concentrations
10,15,20μg/ml for EDA and
10,15,20μg/ml for ARG and
three replicate (n=3)each on different day.
Ψ First-derivative absorbance (D1)
was measured at
280.47nm for EDA and
351.0nm for ARG.
Ψ The %
RSD value of the results corresponding to
the absorbance
was expressed for inter-day precision.
3) Accuracy
It was determined by calculating the recovery of EDA and ARG by standard addition
method.
Accuracy was done by adding both API standard solution and
test solution. Total concentration was as per table 1
Procedure
Table
1: Solutions for Accuracy
Study
Concentration
of Formulation
(΅g/ml) |
Concentration of API in spiking solution (΅g/ml) |
Total concentration of (μg/ml) |
||||
EDA |
ARG |
|||||
EDA |
ARG |
EDA |
ARG |
|||
15 |
5 |
12 |
4 |
27 |
9 |
|
15 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
30 |
10 |
|
15 |
5 |
18 |
6 |
33 |
11 |
Each solution was taken and diluted with Methanol up to
10ml volumetric flask and scanned between 200nm to 400nm against Methanol as a blank.
The amount of EDA and ARG was calculated at each
level
and % recoveries
were computed.
4) LOD (Limit of Detection)
and LOQ (Limit of Quantification):
The Limit of detection and Limit of Quantification
of the developed method was assessed by
analyzing ten replicates of standard solutions containing concentrations 10μg/ml for EDA and 10μg/ml for ARG.
The LOD
and LOQ may be calculated as
Where, SD
= ten replicates of absorbance
Slope = the mean slope
of the 6 calibration curves
5) Robustness
and
ruggedness
Robustness and Ruggedness of the method was determined by subjecting the
method to slight change in
the method condition,
individually, the:
Ψ Change in Stock Solution Preparation,
·
Stock-1
(10mg EDA in 100ml Methanol -100 μg/ml and 10mg ARG in 100ml Methanol - 100 μg/ml)
·
Stock-2
(10mg EDA in 50ml Methanol -200μg/ml
and 10mg ARG in 50ml Methanol - 200 μg/ml)
Ψ Change in
instrument (UV-Vis
Spectrophotometer
model 1800 and 2450),
Three replicates were made for the concentration (10,15,20 μg/ml of EDA and
10,15,20 μg/ml of ARG) with different stock solution
preparation and the recording of absorbances were done on both
the UV-Vis spectrophotometer. % RSD was
calculated.
Analysis of EDA
and
ARG in synthetic mixture:
Composition of synthetic mixture
The preparation of synthetic mixture was as per patent:
Ψ Edaravone : 30mg
Ψ Sodium Bisulphite
: 30mg
Ψ Argatroban:10mg
Ψ Phosphoric acid: q.s
(adjust pH4.5)
Ψ Water for Injection : 7.5 ml (finally upto 25ml)
Ψ All the excipients
were mixed in 100ml volumetric flask dissolved in 25 ml of distilled water and sonicated for 15min. make up the volume with methanol up to
100 ml. The solution was filtered through Whatman filter
paper No.
42.
Finally the solution had concentration 300μg/ml for EDA and 100μg/ml for ARG.
From that pipette out 1 ml in 10 ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to mark with
methanol to obtain final solution containing
30΅g/ml of EDA and
10΅g/ml of ARG.
A zero order derivative spectrum
of the resulting solution was recorded and processed to first derivative spectra. A first order
derivative spectrum of the sample solution was recorded and the absorbance at 280.47nm and 351.0nm
were noted for estimation of EDA and ARG, respectively. The concentrations of EDA and ARG in formulation were determined using
the corresponding
calibration graph.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Selection
of
wavelength and
method development
for
determination of
edaravone and
argatroban
The standard solution of EDA and ARG were scanned separately between 200-400nm,
and zero-order spectra were not showed overlapping peaks.
Thus obtained spectra were then processed to obtain first-derivative spectra.
First order derivative spectrum for EDA showed zero crossing
points: 345.16, 351.0, 356.33. The wavelength selected
for estimation of EDA was 351.0nm because it showed r2>0.999
at this
wavelength
in mixture.
First order derivative spectrum for ARG showed Four zero crossing points:
212.96, 241.13, 259.15, 280.47nm. The wavelength selected
for estimation of ARG was 280.47nm because it showed r2>0.999 at this wavelength
in mixture (Figure 3)
Figure 3:
Overlain zero order spectra
of EDA and ARG, respectively
Figure 4:
Overlain first order spectra of EDA
and ARG
Figure 5: Overlain first order spectra
of EDA and ARG in 3:1 ratios, respectively with
the
combination solution
(3:1)
The overlain first order spectra (fig.3) of EDA
and
ARG reveal that EDA showed
zero
crossing at 351.0nm, while
ARG showed zero
crossing at 280.47nm. At zero
crossing point (ZCP) of EDA (351.0nm), ARG showed an absorbance, whereas at ZCP of ARG (280.47nm), EDA
absorbance. Hence
280.47nm and 351.0nm were
selected as analytical wavelengths for determination of Edaravone and
Argatroban, respectively.
VALIDATION
PARAMETERS:
1. Linearity
and Range
The First-derivative spectra (fig.3) showed linear absorbance at 280.47nm (ZCP of ARG) for EDA (10-35΅g/ml) and
351.0nm (ZCP of EDA) for ARG(10-35΅g/ml) with correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.998 and 0.999
for EDA and ARG, respectively.(30)
This method obeyed beers law in the concentration range 10-35΅g/ml and 10-35΅g/ml for EDA
and ARG, respectively.
(Table 2)
Correlation coefficient (r2) form calibration curve of EDA and ARG was found
to be 0.998and 0.999, respectively.
The regression
line
equation for EDA and ARG are as following,
y = -0.001x +0.000 for EDA _____________ (1)
y = -0.001x +0.00 for ARG ______________ (2)
From the combination solution of EDA and ARG the dilution were made in ratio of 1:1 and absorbance were recorded (Table 2) and correlation
coefficient (r2) of 0.998 and 0.999(figure
7) for EDA and ARG, respectively.
Figure 6 :Overlain linear first order spectra
of EDA (Black) and ARG(Red) in 1:1 ratios
Table
2 : Calibration data
for
EDA and ARG at 280.47nm and 351.0nm,
respectively. *(n=6)
Sr. No |
Concentration
(μg/ml) |
Absorbance*
(280.47nm)±SD EDA |
Absorbance*
(351.0nm)±SD ARG |
|
EDA |
ARG |
|||
1 |
10 |
10 |
-0.0118 ± 0.0007 |
-0.0038 ± 0.0007 |
2 |
15 |
15 |
-0.0159 ± 0.0012 |
-0.0058 ± 0.0011 |
3 |
20 |
20 |
-0.0210± 0.0013 |
-0.0080 ± 0.0006 |
4 |
25 |
25 |
-0.0254± 0.0010 |
-0.0101 ± 0.0007 |
5 |
30 |
30 |
-0.0312 ± 0.0013 |
-0.0121 ± 0.0007 |
6 |
35 |
35 |
-0.0360± 0.0015 |
-0.0140 ± 0.0006 |
2. Precision
I. Intraday
precision
The data for intraday precision for combined standard solution of EDA and
ARG is presented in Table
3.
The % R.S.D
was
found to be 0.263 - 0.480 % for EDA and 0.510 0.989% for ARG.
These %RSD value was found to be less than ± 2.0 indicated that the method is precise.
II. Interday precision
The data for interday precision for combined standard solution of EDA and
ARG is presented in Table 4.
The % R.S.D was
found to be 0.256-0.476% for EDA and 0.583-0.950% for ARG.
These %RSD value was found to be less than ± 2.0 indicated that the method
is precise.
Table
3: Intraday precision data for estimation of EDA
and
ARG *(n=3)
Conc. (μg/ml) |
Abs.* (EDA) Avg. ± SD (280.47nm) |
% RSD |
Abs.* (ARG) Avg.± SD (351.0nm) |
% RSD |
|
EDA |
ARG |
||||
10 |
10 |
-0.0120 ± 0.000057 |
0.480 |
-0.0038 ± 0.000057 |
0.510 |
15 |
15 |
-0.0158 ±
0.000064 |
0.405 |
-0.0058± 0.000057 |
0.989 |
20 |
20 |
-0.0210 ±
0.000057 |
0.263 |
-0.0080 ±
0.000063 |
0.781 |
Table
4: Interday precision data for estimation of EDA
and
ARG *(n=3)
Conc. (μg/ml) |
Abs.* (EDA) Avg. ± SD(280.47nm) |
% RSD |
Abs.* (ARG) Avg.± SD(351.0nm) |
% RSD |
|
EDA |
ARG |
||||
10 |
10 |
-0.0121 ± 0.000057 |
0.476 |
-0.0048 ± 0.000028 |
0.583 |
15 |
15 |
-0.0162 ± 0.000057 |
0.351 |
-0.0060 ± 0.000057 |
0.950 |
20 |
20 |
-0.0222 ± 0.000057 |
0.256 |
-0.0081 ± 0.000055 |
0.679 |
3. Accuracy
Accuracy of the method was determined by recovery study from synthetic
mixture at three levels
(80%, 100%, and 120%) of standard addition.
The % recovery values are tabulated
in Table 5 and 6.
Percentage recovery for EDA and ARG by this method was found in the range
of 100.66 to 101.81% and 99.80-101.81%,
respectively,
The value of %RSD within the limit indicated that the method is accurate and
percentage recovery shows
that there is no interference from
the
excipients.
4. Limit of
detection and quantitation
The LOD for EDA and ARG was conformed to be 1.04΅g/ml and 1.59΅g/ml, respectively.
The LOQ for EDA and ARG was conformed to be 3.16΅g/ml and
4.82 ΅g/ml, respectively.
The obtained LOD and LOQ results
are
presented in Table 7.
5. Robustness
and
Ruggedness
The obtained Ruggedness
and Robustness results are presented
in table 8
The % R.S.D was
found to be 0.199- 0.998% for EDA
and
0.296 0.976% for ARG.
These %RSD value was found to be less than ± 2.0 indicated that the method
is precise.
No significant changes in the spectrums
were observed, proving
that
the developed method
is rugged and
robust.
Application of the proposed method for
analysis of EDA and ARG in
synthetic mixture:
A first order derivative spectrum of the sample solution containing 30΅g/ml of EDA and 0΅g/ml of ARG was recorded and the absorbance at 280.47 nm and
351.0nm were noted for estimation of EDA and ARG, respectively.
The concentration of EDA and ARG
in mixture was determined using
the corresponding calibration
graph.
The results from the analysis of
synthetic mixture containing Edaravone (30mg) and
Argatroban(10mg) in combination are presented in Table in 9.
The percent assay shows that there is no interference from excipients and the proposed method can successfully applied to analysis of commercial
formulation containing EDA and ARG. The % assay values are tabulated in Table
9.
Table
5:Recovery
data of EDA *(n=3)
Conc. of EDA from formulation (΅g/ml) |
Amount
of Std. EDA added (΅g/ml) |
Total amount of EDA (΅g/ml) |
Total amount of
EDA found (΅g/ml)*
Mean ± SD |
% Recovery (n=3) |
% RSD
EDA |
15 |
0 |
15 |
15.17±0.000230 |
101.13% |
0.598 |
15 |
12 |
27 |
27.3 ± 0.000200 |
101.11 % |
0.738 |
15 |
15 |
30 |
30.2 ± 0.000264 |
100.66 % |
0.877 |
15 |
18 |
33 |
33.6 ± 0.000208 |
101.81 % |
0.617 |
Table
6: Recovery data
of ARG*(n=3)
Conc. of ARG from formulation (΅g/ml) |
Amount
of Std. ARG added (΅g/ml) |
Total amount of ARG(΅g/ml) |
Total amount of
ARG found (΅g/ml)*
Mean ± SD |
% Recovery (n=3) |
% RSD
ARG |
5 |
0 |
5 |
4.99 ± 0.000057 |
99.80 |
0.212 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
9.00 ± 0.000050 |
100.00 % |
0.158 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
10.75 ± 0.000030 |
100.75 % |
0.141 |
5 |
6 |
11 |
11.20 ± 0.000028 |
101.81 % |
0.636 |
Table
7: LOD and LOQ data of EDA and ARG
*(n=10)
Conc. (μg/ml) |
Avg. ±
SD (280.47 nm)* EDA |
% RSD |
Avg. ±
SD (351.0 nm)* ARG |
% RSD |
|
EDA |
ARG |
||||
10 |
10 |
-0.0117 ± 0.000316 |
0.266 |
-0.0040 ±
0.000193 |
0.468 |
LOD (μg/ml) |
1.04 |
1.59 |
|||
LOQ (μg/ml) |
3.16 |
4.82 |
Table 8: Robustness and Ruggedness
data of
EDA and ARG *(n=3)
Conc.
(μg/ml) |
Edaravone (Mean*
±% RSD) (n=3) |
||||||||
Different
Instrument |
Different
Stock |
||||||||
UV-2450 |
UV-1800 |
Stock
1 |
Stock
2 |
||||||
10 |
-0.0121
± 0.826 |
-0.0119
± 0.924 |
-0.0119
± 0.924 |
-0.0120
± 0.375 |
|||||
15 |
-0.0160
± 0.354 |
-0.0159
± 0.358 |
-0.0164
± 0.609 |
-0.0170±
0.588 |
|||||
|
20 |
-0.0210
± 0.271 |
-0.0211±
0.805 |
-0.0219
±0.260 |
-0.0221
± 0.261 |
||||
|
Argatroban
(Mean ±% RSD) (n=3) |
||||||||
10 |
-0.0040
± 0.142 |
-0.0039
± 0.146 |
-0.0041
± 0.139 |
-0.0042
± 0.261 |
|||||
|
15 |
-0.0051
± 0.215 |
-0.0049
± 0.142 |
-0.00521±0.117
|
-0.0059±
0.966 |
||||
|
20 |
-0.0080
± 0.712 |
-0.0079
± 0.721 |
-0.0081
± 0.703 |
-0.0078
± 0.730 |
||||
Table
9: Analysis data of commercial formulation *(n=3)
Sr. No. |
Formulation (synthetic mixture) |
Absorbance*
(280.47nm) EDA |
% Assay EDA±SD |
Absorbance* (351.0nm)
ARG |
% Assay ARG±SD |
|
|
EDA |
ARG |
||||
1 |
30 |
10 |
-0.0300 |
100.00 ± 0.000115 |
-0.0039 |
99.00 ± 0.0000529 |
2 |
-0.0310 |
-0.0038 |
||||
3 |
-0.0300 |
-0.0039 |
Table 10: Summary of validation parameters
PARAMETERS |
Absorbance correction method |
|
Edaravone |
Argatroban |
|
Concentration range(΅g/ml) |
10-35 |
10-35 |
Regression equation |
y =
-0.001x + 0.001 |
y =
-0.0004x +0.000 |
Correlation
Coefficient(r2) |
0.9980 |
0.9990 |
Accuracy(%Recovery)
(n=3) |
100.17 |
100.58 |
Intra-day Precision (%RSD) (n=3) |
0.263 -
0.480 % |
0.510
0.989% |
Inter-day precision
(%RSD) (n=3) |
0.256-0.476%
|
0.256-0.476%
|
LOD(΅g/ml) |
1.04΅g/ml |
1.59΅g/ml |
LOQ(΅g/ml) |
3.16΅g/ ml |
4.82 ΅g/ml |
Ruggedness
and Robustness(% RSD) |
0.260-
0.924% |
0.117
0.966% |
% Assay |
100.0 |
99.0 |
CONCLUSION:
All the parameters are validated as per ICH guidelines for the
method validation and found
to be suitable for
routine quantitative analysis in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The
result of linearity, accuracy, precision proved to be
within limits with lower limits of
detection and quantification. Ruggedness and Robustness of method was confirmed as no significant were observed
on analysis by subjecting the method
to slight change in
the method condition. Assay
results obtained by proposed
method are in fair agreement.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
We are sincerely thankful to Shree Dhanvantary
Pharmacy College, Kim, Surat, for providing us
Infrastructure facilities and moral support to carry out this research work. We
are also thankful to SDPARC for giving us their special time and guidance for
this research work. We also thank our colleagues for their helping hand.
REFERENCES:
1.
Harukuni I
and Bhardwaj A. Mechanisms of brain injury after
global cerebral ischemia. Neurologic Clinics. 24(1) ; 2006 : 121.
2.
Keiichi
Tesseikai, Katsumi C/o. Drugs comprising combination
of anti thrombotic agent with pyrazolone derivative.
European Patent EP1437137B1, 2008.
3.
Combination
therapy for Acute ischemic stroke study group. Edaravone and Argatroban stroke
therapy study for acute ischemic stroke. 2008, Available from:http://www.
ClinicalTrials.gov./show/NCT00153946.
4.
Doherty
AM, Annual reports in Medicinal Chemistry, Boston: Academic Press, 2002,
pp 37.
5.
Watanabe
T. et. al. Research
and development of the free radical scavenger Edaravone
as a neuroprotectant. Yakugaku Zasshi (in
Japanese), , 124(3); 2004: 99111.
6.
Higashi
Y, Jitsuiki D, Chayama K
and Yoshizumi M, Edaravone
(3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one). a novel free
radical scavenger, for treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Recent Patents on Cardivascular
Drug Disorder. 1(1); 2006:
8593.
7.
Yoshida
H. et. al. Neuroprotective Effects of Edaravone:
A novel free radical scavenger in cerebrovascular
injury. CNS Drug Review, 12(1);
2006: 920.
8.
Yuan
WJ et. al. Neuroprotective effects of Edaravone-administration
on 6-OHDA-treated dopaminergic neurons. BMC NeuroScience.
9(1); 2008: 75.
9.
Kawasaki T et.
al. Protective effect of the radical scavenger Edaravone against methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mouse striatum. European Journal of Pharmacology. 542(1-3); 2006: 9299.
10.
Kawasaki T et.al. Edaravone
(3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one), a radical scavenger, prevents
1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine Induced
Neurotoxicity in the Substantianigra but not the
Striatum. Journal of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics. 322(1); 2007: 274281.
11.
Yokoyama H et.
al., Role of Reactive nitrogen and reactive oxygen species against MPTP
neurotoxicity in mice. Journal of
Neural Transmission, 115(6); 2008: 831842.
12.
Yokoyama
H et. al. Comparative pharmacological
study of free radical scavenger, nitric oxide synthase
inhibitor, nitric oxide synthase activator and cyclooxygenase inhibitor against MPTP neurotoxicity in
mice. Metabolic Brain Disorder,
23(3); 2008: 335349.
13.
Escolar G,
Bozzo J and Maragall S. Argatroban a direct thrombin inhibitor with reliable and
predictable anticoagulant action. Drug
today. 42(4); 2006: 223-236.
14.
Drug
Profile, Available from: www.chemicalbook.com/ProductMSDSDetailCB1287462_EN.htm
15.
Ping
Liao, Zheng-Yu Yan and Xiao Sun. A novel fluorescent
assay for Edaravone with aqueous functional CdSe quantum dots. Spectrochimica
Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular
Spectroscopy. 72(5); 2009: 1066-1070.
16.
Gandhimathi
M, Kumar MS, Baghla R and Ravi TK. RP-HPTLC Method
for the In Vitro Estimation of Edaravone in
Human Plasma. Indian Journal of
Pharmaceutical science.72(2); 2010:
276-282.
17.
Li jin-lin et. al. Determination of Phenylhydrazine
Residues in Edaravone by HPLC. Institute of Medical Information, CAMS.
2(1); 2009: 24-28.
18.
Fu Gui-Ying, WEN Ming-Ling and ZUO Xiu
Ping. Determination of content
and related substance of Edaravone injection by HPLC.
Journal of Chinese people΄s Liberation Army. 2(1); 2009: 101-14.
19.
WEI
Min, XIAO Yi. Determination of concentration of Edaravone
in human serum by RP HPLC. Clinical
pharmacology. 10(2); 2007-08: 142-143.
20. Patel Bhumi K et. al. Method development and validation of RP HPLC for
simultaneous estimation of Edaravone and Citicoline sodium in synthetic mixture. inventi rapid: pharmaceutical analysis and Quality
Assurance publication.1(1); 2014: 31-35.
21. Tang DQ, Bian TT and Jiang SS, LC-MS/MS methods for the
determination of Edaravone and/or Taurine
in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. Biomed Chromatography. 28(9); 2014: 1173-82.
22. Patel Bhumi K, Raj Hasumati A and Jain Vineet C, Simultaneous Estimation of Edaravone
and Citicoline sodium by Ratio derivative
spectroscopic method in synthetic mixture. Pharmascience Monitor, An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Scence.
5(2); 2014: 118-128.
23. Patel Bhumi K, Raj Hasumati A, Jain Vineet C, First Derivative Spectroscopic Method For
Simultaneous Estimation of Edaravone and Citicoline Sodium in Synthetic Mixture. Research and Reviews, Journal of Pharmaceutical
Analysis. 3(2); 2014:
37-44.
24. Singh Atul Pratap, Eswari, T. S., Gurusharan, and Verma
V. Formulation and Evaluation of Parenteral Drug Edaravone. International
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Scholars, , 3(4);
2014: 134-141.
25. Supplement to
Japanese Pharmacopoeia, The Ministry of Health, Labour And Welfare, 15thEdn; Official From
October 1, 2009, pp 2087, 2088.
26. Ahmad S, Ahsan A and George M, Simultaneous monitoring of Argatroban and its major metabolite using an HPLC method:
potential clinical application. Clinical
and applied thrombosis-hemostasis. 5(4); 1999: 252-8.
27. GUO Xu-guang, ZHENG Zi-dong, Content
Determination of Argatroban Injection by RP-HPLC. China Phamacy.
2013: 33.
28. GUO Da-qing, et al., Methodology on determination of Argatroban in human plasma. Central South Pharmacy, , 3(1); 2009: 134-137.
29. Rhea JM, Snyder
ML and Winkler AM, Development of a fast and simple liquid
chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitation
of Argatroban in patient plasma samples, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical
technologies in the biomedical and life sciences. 15, 2012; 893-894:168-72.
30. Beckett AH, Stenlake
JB, Davidson
AG. Ultraviolet-Visible absorption
spectrophotometry,
Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, 4th Edn; New Delhi,
CBS Publishers, 2002, pp 275-300.
31. International Conference on Harmonization,
Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures Text and
Methodology, ICH Q2 (R1), 2005.
Received on 02.02.2015 Accepted on 28.02.2015
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Res.
Pharm. Sci. 5(1):
Jan.-March 2015; Page 27-35
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5659.2015.00005.3