Current Innovation in Layered Tablet Technology: Review

 

Pramodaganta, Ashok kumar P.*, Surendrabhoopathi. G, Suresh V. Kulakarni

Sree Siddaganga College of Pharmacy, B.H. Road, Tumkur- 572102.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: ashokkumarscp@yahoo.com

 

 

ABSTRACT:

In the recent tablets have got more attraction compared to other dosage forms because of simple, inexpensive, highest stability, most suitable nature of tablets. Layered tablets are having greater advantages in current research and development. More number of polymers are available for the preparation of matrix core and it is also acting as release retardant layers. Several methods are used to alter the release rate of drugs by oral route of administration. Layered matrix tablets are one among the method which is used for effective controlled drug delivery. In this review article types of layered tablets, formulation techniques, and various materials used in formulation, various tablet presses, marketed products were analysed in detailed manner.

KEYWORDS: Layered tablets, bi-layered tablets, multi-layered, technologies, approaches.

 


INTRODUCTION:

1) LAYERED TABLETS:

There are three categories under the class of layered tablets:

1) Layered tablets - two to three component systems.

Layer tablets are collected of two or three layers of granulation compressed together. As the edges of each layer are visible, they have the appearance of a sandwich. Fig:1, 2, 3 shows various types of layered tablets. This dosage form has the advantage of separating two discordant substances with an inert barrier among them. It makes possible sustained-release preparations with the immediate-release quantity in one layer and the slow release portion in the second. A third layer with an intermediate release might be added. [1]

 

Fig 1: Single layered tablets Fig 2: Bi layered tablet

 

Fig 3: Multi layered tablet

 

NEED OF BILAYER TABLETS: [2]

v  For the administration of fixed dose recipes of different APIs, to prolong the drug product life cycle, buccal/muco adhesive delivery systems, fabricate novel drug delivery systems such as chewing device and floating tablets for gastro-retentive drug delivery.

v  Controlling the delivery rate of either single or two different active pharmaceutical

Ingredient(s)

v  To modify the total surface area available for API layer either by sandwiching with one or two inactive layers in order to achieve swellable/erodible barriers for modified release.

v  To separate incompatible Active pharmaceutical ingredient from each other, to control the release of API from one layer by utilizing the functional property of the other layer (such as, osmotic property).

 

Fig 4: Bi layered tablet

ADVANTAGES OF THE BI-LAYER TABLET DOSAGE FORM: [3]

v  Cheaper in cost compared to all other oral dosage form.

v  Suitable for large scale production.

v  Greater chemical and microbial stability over all oral dosage form.

v  Intolerable odour and bitter taste can be masked by coating technique.

v  Flexible Concept.

v  They are unit dosage form and offer the greatest capabilities of all oral dosage form for the greatest dose precision and the least content variability.

v  Easy to crediting with least tendency for hang-up.

 

DISADVANTAGES OF BI-LAYER TABLET DOSAGE FORM ARE:[3]

v  Some drugs resist compression into dense compacts, owing to amorphous nature, low

density character.

v  Difficult to gulp in case of children and unconscious patients.

v  Bitter tasting drugs, drugs with an intolerable odour or drugs that are sensitive to oxygen may require encapsulation or coating.

v  Drugs with poor wetting, slow dissolution properties, optimum absorption high in GIT may be difficult to formulate or manufacture as a tablet that will still provide adequate or full drug.

 

Multi-layered tablets

When two or more active pharmaceutical ingredients are needed to be administered simultaneously and they are incompatible, the best option for the formulation pharmacist would be to formulate multi-layered tablet. It consists of several different granulations that are compressed to form a single tablet composed of two or more layers and usually each layer is of different colour to produce a distinctive looking tablet. Each layer is fed from separate feed frame with individual weight control. Dust extraction is essential during compression to avoid contamination. Therefore, each layer undergoes light compression as each component is laid down. This avoids granules intermixing if the machine vibrates.

 

v  For example, admixture containing Phenylephedrin HCL and Ascorbic Acid with Paracetamol.

v  Paracetamol + Phenylephedrine Hydrochloride - One layer

v  Paracetamol + Ascorbic acid - Another layer.

 

Fig 5: Multi-layered Tablet

 

Reasons for the formulation of multi-layered tablets.

The tablets in this category are prepared for two reasons:

v  To separate physically or chemically incompatible ingredients and to produce repeat action/ prolonged action tablet.

v  The tablet manufacturing machine is generally operated at relatively lower speed than for standard compression tablet.

 

MARKETED PRODUCTS OF BILAYERED TABLETS

Table 1: MARKETED PRODUCTS OF BILAYERED TABLETS

PRODUCT NAME

CHEMICAL NAME

DEVOLOPER

 

ALPRAX PLUS

 

Sertraline, Alprazolam

Levocetrizine hydrochloride,

Phenylpropanolamine, Paracetamol

Torrent Pharmaceutcals Ltd.

NEWCOLD PLUS

Gliclazide, Metformin hydrochloride

Piramol Healthcare Ltd.

DIAMICRON®XRMEX500

Gliclazide, Metformin hydrochloride

Sedia® Pharmaceuticals (India) Pvt. Ltd.

DIUCONTIN-K®20/250

Furosemide,Potassiumchloride

T.C. Health Care Pvt. Ltd.

TRIOMUNE 30

Nevirapine,Lamivudine, Stavudine

Cipla Ltd.

PIOKIND®-M15

Pioglitazone,metformine hydrochloride

Psychotropics India Ltd.

REVELOL®-AM 25/5

Metoprololsuccinate, Amlodipine besilate

Ipca Laboratories Ltd.

 

VARIOUS TECHNIQUES INVOLVED IN FORMULATION:

OROS® push pull technology[6]

This system consist of mainly two or three layer among which the one or more layer are essential of the drug and other layer are consist of push layer. The drug layer mainly consists of drug along with two or more different agents. So this drug layer comprises of drug which is in poorly soluble form. There is further addition of suspending agent and osmotic agent. A semi permeable membrane surrounds the tablet core.

 

Fig 6: OROS® push pull technology

 

Fig 7:L-OROS® technology

 

Fig 8: EN SO TROL technology

 


L-OROS® technology[6]

The L-Oros® system was designed to provide continuous delivery of liquid drug formulations and improve bioavailability of the drugs. L-Oros system consists of two types i.e., soft gelatin capsule (SoftcapTM) and hard gelatin capsule (HardcapTM). Both have a drug layer, barrier layer and a push layer surrounded by a semipermeable membrane with a delivery orifice. The L-OrosHardcap system was designed to accommodate more viscous suspensions with higher drug loading than Softcap design.

 

EN SO TROL technology [7]

Solubility enhancement of an order of magnitude or to create optimized dosage form Shire laboratory use an integrated approach to drug delivery focusing on identification and incorporation of the identified enhancer into controlled release technologies.

 

DUREDASTM technology [7]

DUREDAS or Dual Release Drug Absorption System (Elan Corporation) utilizes bilayer tableting technology, which has been specifically developed to provide two different release rates or dual release of a drug from a single dosage form. The tablets are prepared by two separate direct compression steps that combine an immediate release granulate (for rapid onset of action) and a controlled release hydrophilic matrix complex within one tablet. The controlled release matrix remains intact and slowly absorbs fluid from the GI tract, which causes the matrix. To expand and transforms the hydrophilic polymers into a porous, viscous gel that serves as a barrier between the drug and the surrounding fluid. As the gel continues to expand, fluid penetrates further into the dosage form, dissolving the drug and allowing the resulting solution to diffuse out in a controlled manner. A further extension of the duredas technology is the production of controlled release combination dosage forms whereby two different drugs are incorporated into the different layers, and the drug release of each layer is controlled to maximize therapeutic effect of the combination. Again both immediate release and controlled release combinations of the two drugs are feasible.

 

Benefits offered by the DUREDAS™ technology include:

v  Bilayer tableting technology.

v   Tailored release rate of two drug components.

v  Capability of two different control release formulations combined.

v  Capability for immediate release and modified release components in one tablet

v  Unit dose tablet presentation

 

DUROS technology [7]

DUROS (Alza Corporation) is based on implant technology, which provides an alternative for the delivery of a wide range of therapeutic compounds, including peptides, proteins, and other bioactive macromolecules. These implants are miniature titanium cylinders designed to provide continuous osmotically driven delivery of drugs within the body for up to one year. Following implantation, DUROS implants enable continuous, precise delivery of the therapeutic compound at rates as low as 1% of a drop of water per day. The cylinder is manufactured from titanium because of the material’s tolerability to human tissue and its long use in medical devices such as implantable defibrillators and joint replacements. The cylinder protects therapeutic agents from degradation in the body and enables a drug to remain stable for extended periods of time. Recently, Viadur (leuprolide acetate implant), which is based upon this technology, has been approved for once yearly palliative treatment of advanced prostate cancer

 

Fig 9: DUROS technology

 

PRODAS technology [7]

PRODAS or Programmable Oral Drug Absorption System (Elan Corporation) is a multi-particulate drug delivery technology that is based on the encapsulation of controlledrelease minitablets in the size range of 1.5 to 4 mm in diameter. This technology represents a combination of multi-particulate and hydrophilic matrix tablet technologies and thus provides the benefits of both these drug delivery systems in one dosage form. Mini-tablets with different release rates can be combined and incorporated into a single dosage form to provide the desired release rates. These combinations may include immediate release, delayed release, and/or controlled release minitablets. In addition to controlled absorption over a specified period, PRODAS technology also enables targeted delivery of drug to specified sites of absorption throughout the GI tract. Combination products also are possible by using mini-tablets formulated with different active ingredients.

 

GEMINEX technology [8]

Geminex is a dual drug delivery technology that can deliver one or more drugs at different times. The Geminex technology controls the release rate of the two drugs to maximize their individual therapeutic effect and minimize side effects. The benefit of geminex to the pharmaceutical industry, and ultimately to patients, is that two different actives or the same active can be delivered at differing rates in a single tablet. Penwest is actively applying its geminex technology to the following therapeutic areas: cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, cancer and disorders of the central nervous system

 

Various Approaches Used in the Bilayer Tablet: [9]

Floating Drug Delivery System

These are designed to have a low density and thus float on gastric contents after Administration until the system either disintegrates or the device absorbs fluid to the point Where its density is such that it loses buoyancy and can pass more easily from the stomach with a wave of motility responsible for gastric emptying. The bilayer tablet is designed in such a manner that one layer gives the immediate dosing of the drug which gives faster onset of action while other layer is designed as a floating layer which floats in the stomach (GI-fluid).

 

Disadvantages:

It may not have the controlled loss of density alternatively required for it to eventually exit from the stomach. Floating tablets are not applicable to higher dose levels of highly water soluble drugs where large amounts of polymer are needed to retard drug release, as in case of water soluble drugs. The performance of floating formulation may also be posture dependant. A patient sitting upright may ensure prolonged gastric residence of a buoyant dosage form, whereas a supine patient might allow ready presentation of the floating dosage form to the pylorus and thus allow rapid exit of the dosage form from the stomach. Hence, floating dosage forms might be expected to only have limited applications.

 

Polymeric Bioadhesive System

These are designed to imbide fluid following administration such that the outer layer becomes a viscous, tacky material that adheres to the gastric mucosa/mucus layer. This should encourage gastric retention until the adhesive forces are weakened. These are prepared as one layer with immediate dosing and other layer with bio-adhesive property.

 

Disadvantages: The success seen in animal models with such system has not been translated to human subjects due to differences in mucous amounts, consistency between animals and humans. The system adheres to mucous not mucosa. The mucous layer in humans would appear to slough off readily, carrying any dosage form with it. Therefore bioadhesive dosage form would not appear to offer a solution for extended delivery of drug over a period of more than a few hours.

 

c) Swelling System

These are designed to be sufficiently small on administration so as not to make ingestion of the dosage form difficult (e.g., less than approximately 23 mm long and less than 11 mm wide for an oval or capsule –shaped tablet whereas 10- 12mm in diameter for round tablets). On ingestion they rapidly swell or disintegrate or unfold to a size that precludes passage through the pylorus until after drug release has progressed to a required degree. Gradual erosion of the system or its breakdown into smaller particles enables it to leave stomach. The simple bilayer tablet may contain an immediate release layer with the other layer as extended release or conventional release.

 

EVALUATION OF SUSTAIN RELEASE BILAYER TABLET [10]

Tablet Thickness and Size

Thickness and diameter of tablets were important for uniformity of tablet size. Thickness and diameter was measured using venire calliper.

Tablet Hardness

The resistance of tablets to shipping or breakage under conditions of storage, transportation and handling before usage depends on its hardness. The hardness of tablet of each formulation was measured by Monsanto hardness tester. The hardness was measured in kg/cm2.

Friability

Friability is the measure of tablet strength. Electrolab EF-2 friabilator (USP) was used for testing the friability using the following procedure. Twenty tablets were weighed accurately and placed in the tumbling apparatus that revolves at 25 rpm dropping the tablets through a distance of six inches with each revolution. After 4 min, the tablets were weighed and the percentage loss in tablet weight was determined.

Percentage loss = [(Initial wt. of tablets – Final wt. of tablets)/ Initial wt. of tablets] ×100

Uniformity of weight

Twenty tablets were selected at random and the average weight was calculated. Weight Variation was calculated and was compared with I. P. standards.

 

CHARACTERAIZATION OF BILAYER TABLETS [11]

Particle size distribution

The particle size distribution was measured using sieving method

Photo-microscope Study

Photo-microscope image of TGG and GG was taken (X450 magnifications) by photomicroscope

Angle of Repose

The diameter of the powder cone was measured and the angle of repose was calculated using the following equation.

Tan Ř=h/r

Where h and r are the height and radius of the powder cone.

Moisture Sorption Capacity

All disintegrates have capacity to absorb moisture from atmosphere which affects moisture sensitive drugs. Moisture sorption capacity was performed by taking 1 g of disintegrate uniformly distributed in Petri-dish and kept in stability chamber at 37±1°C and 100% relative humidity for 2 days and investigated for the amount of moisture uptake by difference between weights.

Density

The loose bulk density (LBD) and tapped bulk density (TBD) were determined and calculated using the following formulas.

LBD = weight of the powder/volume of the packing

TBD = weight of the powder/tapped volume of the packing

 

Compressibility

The compressibility index of the disintegrate was determined by Carr’s compressibility index.

 

VARIOUS TYPES OF BI-LAYER TABLET PRESSES [12]:

Single sided press

Various types of bi-layer presses have been designed over the years. The simplest design is a single sided press with both chambers of the double feeder separated from each other. Each chamber is gravity- or forced-fed with a different powder, thus producing the two individual layers of the tablet. When the die passes under the feeder, it is at first loaded with the first-layer powder followed by the second-layer powder. Then the entire tablet is compressed in one or two steps (two = pre- and main compression). The two layers in the die mix slightly at their interface and in most cases bond sufficiently so that no layer-separation occurs when the tablet is produced. This is the simplest way of producing a bilayer tablet.

 

Limitations of single-sided press.

Various types of bi-layer presses have been designed over the years. The simplest design is a single-sided press with both chambers of the double feeder separated from each other. Each chamber is gravity- or forced-fed with a different powder, thus producing the two individual layers of the tablet. When the die passes under the feeder, it is at first loaded with the first-layer powder followed by the second-layer powder. Then the entire tablet is compressed in one or two steps (two = pre- and main compression). The two layers in the die mix slightly at their interface and in most cases bond sufficiently. So the layer-separation does not occur when the tablet is produced. This is the simplest way of producing a bilayer tablet.

It undergoes certain limitation as follow

No weight monitoring/control of the individual Layers.

v  No distinct visual separation between the two Layers.

v  Very short first layer-dwell time due to the small compression roller, possibly resulting in poor deaeration,capping and hardness problems. This may be corrected by reducing the turret-rotation speed (to extend the dwell time) but with the consequence of lower tablet output.

v  Very difficult first-layer tablet sampling and sample transport to a test unit for in-line quality control and weight recalibration to eliminate these limitations, a double-sided tablet press is preferred over a singlesided press. A double-sided press offers an individual fill station, pre -compression and main compression for each layer. In fact, the bi-layer tablet will go through 4 compression stages before being ejected from the press

 

Double-sided tablet presses:

Double-sided tablet presses have been specifically designed and developed for the production of quality bilayer tablets and provide:

v  Displacement weight monitoring/control for accurate and independent weight control of the individual layers

v  Low compression force exerted on the first layer to avoid capping and separation of the two individual layers

v  increased dwell time at pre-compression of both first and second layer to provide sufficient hardness at maximum turret speed

v  Maximum prevention of cross-contamination between the two layers

v  A clear visual separation between the two layers

v  maximised yield

 

Preparation of Bilayer Tablet [13]:

Bilayer tablets are prepared with one layer of drug for immediate release with the second layer designed to release drug later, either as a second dose or in an extended release form8. The bilayer tablets with two incompatible drugs can also be prepared by compressing separate layers of each drug so as to minimize area of contact between two layers. An additional intermediate layer of inert material may also be included.


 

Fig 10: Preparation of Bilayer Tablet

 


MATEIRIALS USED IN LAYERED TABLETS:

Table 2: Materials used in layered tablets

CATEGORY

MATEIRIALS

 

Polymers

HPMC K15M, eudragit L100-55, eudragit S 100,HPMC E 5, HPMC K4M,Carbopol 934, Carbopol 974, xanthan gum, guar gum, locust bean gum, ethyl cellulose etc

 

Fillers

Lactose, anhydrous talc, sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, carboxy methyl cellulose, Microcrystalinecellulose,Aerosol, mannitol,maize starchetc

Gas generating agents

Citric acid, sodium bicarbonateetc

Preservatives

Propyl paraben, methyl parabenetc

Glidant

Clloidal anhydrous silica, magnesium stearate,talcetc

Binder

PVP K 30 etc

 

CONCLUSION:

Quality of layered tablets can be improved and GMP requirements greatly achieved by using recent sophisticated technologies. Layered tablets are able to provide abundant advantages like to get immediate release as well as controlled release in single dosage form, to avoid incompatibility between two or more active pharmaceutical ingredient, cost lesser and more stable.

 

REFERENCES:

1)       Drug Dosage Forms II (PHR 312). Solid dosage forms. Available From: URL: http://www.pua.edu.eg/PUASite/uploads/file/Pharmacy/fall/PHR312/week1/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20Drug%20Dosage%20Forms%20II accessed on 10 July 2011.

2)       Panchel hiten ashok and Tiwari ajay kumar. A Novel approach of bilayer tablet technology-A review. IRJP. 3(5); 2012:  44-49.

3)       Nirmal J, Saisivam S and Peddanna C et al. Bilayer tablets of atorvastatin calcium and nicotinic acid: formulation and evaluation. Chem.Pharm.Bull. 5(6); 2008: 1455–58.

4)       Streubel A,Siepmann J and peppas NA et al. drug release achieved with multi-layered matrix tablets: transport mechanism and drug design. J Control release. 6(9); 2000: 455-68.

5)       Vogeleer J and De Smet P. Bi-layer tablets- Why special technology is required. Powder technology division, Niro Pharma systems.

6)       Rajan K Verma and Sanjay Garg. Current Status of Drug Delivery Technologies and Future Directions. Pharmaceutical Technology On-Line. 25 (2); 2001: 1–14.

7)       Deshpande R D, Gowda D V and Mahammed N et al. Bi-layer tablets-An Emerging trend : A Review. IJPSR. 2(10); 2011: 2534-44.

8)       Rajan K. Verma, Sanjay Garg et al. Current status of drug delivery technologies and future directions. Pharmaceutical Technology. 25(2); 2001:1-14.

9)       Timmins et al. Biphasic controlled release system for high solubility pharmaceuticals and method. United states patent 64,75,521. 5th November 2002.

10)    Priyal.S.Nilawar, Wankhade V.P and Badnag D.B. An emerging trend on bilayer tablets. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science Research. 3(1); 2013:15-21.

10)singh B. N and Kim, K.H:Floating drug delivery systems an approach to oral controlled drug delivery via gastric retension. J Control Rel. 2000: 235-59

11)    Patel M, Sockan G N, kavitha and Mani T. Challenges in the formulation of bilayered tablets: A review. Int J Pharm Res Dev 2010; 2(10):30-42.

12)   Li SP, Karth M.G, Feld K.M and Pendharkar C.M et al. Evaluation of Bilayer tablet machines. A Case study. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm 1995; 21(5): 571-90.

 

 

Received on 08.11.2013          Accepted on 01.12.2013        

© Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci.  2013; Vol. 3: Issue 4, Pg 189-194